related party transaction 7

grammar When do you use “relate to” versus “relate with”? English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

“yo me relaciono con todo” (I relate with everything). According to, Lingo.help, 88% of the times the verb “related” is followed by “to.” Given it has at least two upvotes and it is asked frequently on the internet, I thought I would give it a try.

Answers

• Its normal that prospective employers won’t want family members to give you a reference as they expect them to be biased.
• Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
• This metaphor is weak because the people story analogy would be fulfilled more precisely with nerve cell impulse.
• “Related by blood” and “related through a common ancestral language” are examples for another thread.

Examples 3 and 4 are not wrong necessarily, but they do stretch the meaning of relate beyond its established core. However, I think there is a subtle difference between the two, one I can’t readily support with a good source at the moment. These two words are close, and in most cases, they are interchangeable.

• Yes, it asking whether you are related by blood or marriage (and may be tempted to turn a blind eye to the candidate’s faults).
• I’m filling an employment reference form and I’m not sure what this means.
• “Related by blood” and “related through a common ancestral language” are examples for another thread.
• This metaphor is weak because the people story analogy would be fulfilled more precisely with nerve cell impulse.
• Examples sentences 1 and 2 of the OP relate precisely to the carry back theme of ODO definition 1.3.

Thus when the word ‘relate’ means ‘interact’ in your writing, the right preposition is ‘with’ and not ‘to’. Yes, it asking whether you are related by blood or marriage (and may be tempted to turn a blind eye to the candidate’s faults). Nerve cells relate to one another through thin fibers. This usually means that I have formulated a question that addresses a similar subject to the one you addressed in your work. I’m letting you know about it in case you have any thoughts on it or believe it’s worth investigating.

Stack Exchange Network

The other occasions in which “related” is followed by a “with” in the NYT indicate communication or giving, as two quotes above show (see here). 1- “Relate to” should be used when the meaning of the verb is about connections. For example, “I relate to your pain” and “Those cases relate to each other.” If you want to follow standard English, avoid “I relate with your pain,” and so on. I’m filling an employment reference form and I’m not sure what this means.

Stack Exchange Network

I think the main difference is that if your subject DOES the action so you should use “relating to” but if it RECEIVES the action “related to” must be used. “Related to” only means that there is some kind of connection while “relating to” indicates something that is about the topic. But we relate warmly with each ther now, but still, only on matters related to our office assignments. If you look up the word ‘relate’ in any dictionary, it also means ‘interact’.

Facebook Connect

Does it mean, are you related in terms of kinship or related professionally. Examples sentences 1 and 2 of the OP relate precisely to the carry back theme of ODO definition 1.3. Relate connects the noun phrase my question conceptually to the noun phrase your earlier work, revealing that the question carries back to the original earlier work. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I think that they connect to or communicate with each other via axons and dendrites. Maybe it would be worth rewriting those last two examples and submitting them as a separate question.

You must log in to answer this question.

This metaphor is weak because the people story analogy would be fulfilled more precisely with nerve cell impulse. Example sentences 3 and 4 of the OP seems to relate weakly to ODO definition 1.1. The noun phrase nerve cells is connected to the noun phrase one another. Since neither actually carries back to the other as the original, it sounds slightly off to the native ear. For instance, if I asked for websites relating to english.stackexchange.com, I might expect to get meta.english.stackexchange.com, maybe some news articles that cover the site, and a blog entry by a founder. Sites with reputations for quality writing, like the , belie the rule but in few occasions, which suggests these cases were slips.

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Most experts agree that language is not static and that rules are meant to facilitate communication rather than the other way around. “Related with” is perfectly understandable to most English-based readers, and the evidence is not simply in its increasing use in personal pages in the internet, but also in peer-review publications (see here). Though I prefer to follow standard practices in non-native languages, I would stay unperturbed at examples of “with” replacing “to” and would see it as evidence of a change in progress. Example sentences 3 and 4 could also be a weak metaphoric application of ODO definition 3.0, since the nerve cells could be seen as relating by means of fibers in the same fashion as people relate with stories.

Facebook Connect

The answer would be different from the one I have provided above. “Related by blood” and “related through a common ancestral language” are examples for another thread. They are looking for a disclosure of potential nepotism. Its normal that prospective employers won’t want family members to give you related party transaction a reference as they expect them to be biased.